Measuring the Effects of a Semester Abroad on Students’ Oral Proficiency Gains: A Comparison of At Home and Study Abroad

Authors

  • Christopher J. Jochum

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v24i1.338

Keywords:

Spanish, Oral Proficiency interview by computer, Study abroad, at-home, Proficiency gains

Abstract

This study investigates oral proficiency gains among study-abroad (SA) and at-home (AH) students over the course of one semester. Using the Oral Proficiency Interview by Computer (OPIc), students (N=18) were assessed before and after studying Spanish either on-campus or abroad. Findings revealed that while both groups’ mean proficiency scores improved, the SA group showed significant pre-post improvement. The percentage of students who improved at least one proficiency level was 44% for the AH group and 89% among SA participants, whose minimum post-test level was Intermediate-Mid. Only two students (SA group), however, reached the Advanced-Low level. Results outline some of the implications and limitations associated with semester-long study abroad and increased oral proficiency and offer suggestions for future research. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Christopher J. Jochum

Christopher J. Jochum, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Spanish and Foreign Language Education at the University of Nebraska at Kearney. His research interests include study abroad, foreign language proficiency, teacher education and online instruction.

References

Allen, H. W., & Herron, C. A. (2003). A mixed methodology investigation of the linguistic and affective outcomes of summer study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 36(3), 370-384.

American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. ACTFL proficiency guidelines—Speaking. (1999). Yonkers, NY: ACTFL.

American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (n.d.). Certified proficiency testing

program. http://www.actfl.org/professional-development/certified-proficiency-testingprogram#opi

American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (2013, August). ACTFL/CAEP program standards for the preparation of foreign language teachers. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.

Barfield, S. C. (1994). Evaluation of the National Endowment for the Humanities fellowships for foreign

language teachers K-12. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Brecht, R. D., Davidson, D. E., & Ginsberg, R. B. (1995). Predictors of foreign language gain during study abroad. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 37-66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Collentine, J. (2004). The effects of learning contexts on morphosyntactic and lexical development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 227-248.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Cubillos, J. H., & Ilvento, T. (2012). The impact of study abroad on students’ self-efficacy perceptions. Foreign Language Annals, 45(4), 494-511.

Davidson, D. E. (2007). Study abroad and outcomes measurements: The case of Russian. Modern Language Journal, 91, 276–280.

Davidson, D. E. (2010). Study abroad: When, how long, and with what results? New data from the Russian front. Foreign Language Annals, 43(1), 6-26.

Educational Testing Service. (n.d.). Spanish: World Language. Available:

http://www.ets.org/s/praxis/pdf/5195.pdf

Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2004). Interlanguage refusals: Linguistic politeness and length of residence in the target community. Language Learning, 54(4), 587-653,

Freed, B. F. (1990). Language learning in a study abroad context: The effects of interactive and noninteractive out-of-class contact on grammatical achievement and oral proficiency. In J. Atlantis

(Ed.), Linguistics, language teaching and language acquisition: The interdependence of theory,

practice and research (pp. 459-477). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Freed, B. F. (1995). What makes us think that students who study abroad become fluent? In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 123-148). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Freed B., So, S., & Lazar, N. (2003). Language learning abroad: How do gains in written fluency compare with gains in oral fluency in French as a second language? ADFL Bulletin, 34(3), 34-40. Available: http://www.adfl.org/bulletin/V34N3/343034.htm.

Freed, B., Segalowitz, N., & Dewery, D. (2004). Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 275-301.

Hernández, T. A. (2010). Promoting speaking proficiency through motivation and interaction: The study abroad and classroom learning contexts. Foreign Language Annals, 43(4):650–670.

Hubert, M. D. (2013). The development of speaking and writing proficiencies in the Spanish language classroom: A case study. Foreign Language Annals, 46(1), 88–95.

Isabelli-García, C. (2010). Acquisition of Spanish gender agreement in two learning contexts: Study abroad and at home. Foreign Language Annals, 43(2), 289-303.

Krathwohl, D. R. (1998). Methods of educational and social science research. New York:Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Language Testing International. (n.d.) Oral Proficiency Interview by Computer (OPIc). Available:

http://www.languagetesting.com/oral-proficiency-interview-by-computer-opic

Lindseth, M. U. (2010). The development of oral proficiency during a semester in Germany. Foreign

Language Annals, 43(2):246–268.

Magnan, S. S. & Back, M. (2007). Social interaction and linguistic gain during study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 40(1), 44-61

Rivers, W. P. (1998). Is being there enough? The effects of homestay placement on language gain

during study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 31(4), 492-500.

Schmidt-Rinehart, B. C., Knight, S. M. (2004). The homestay component of study abroad: Three perspectives. Foreign Language Annals 37(2). 254-262.

Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. F. (2004). Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,

(2), 173-199.

Segalowitz, N., Freed, B., Collentine, J., Lafford, B., Lazar, N., & Diaz-Campos, M. (2004). A comparison of Spanish second language acquisition in two different learning contexts: Study abroad and the domestic classroom. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 10, 1-18.

Simoes, A. R. M. (1996). Phonetics in second language acquisition: An acoustic study of fluency in adult learners of Spanish. Hispania, 79, 87-95.

Swender, E. (2003). Oral proficiency testing in the real world: Answers to frequently asked questions. Foreign Language Annals, 36(4). 520-535.

Tschirner, E. (2007). The development of oral proficiency in a four-week intensive immersion program in Germany, 40(2), 111-117.

Wilkinson, S. (1998). Study abroad from the participants’ perspective: A challenge to common beliefs. Foreign Language Annals 31(1), 23-39.

Downloads

Published

2014-08-15

How to Cite

Jochum, C. J. (2014). Measuring the Effects of a Semester Abroad on Students’ Oral Proficiency Gains: A Comparison of At Home and Study Abroad. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 24(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v24i1.338